Monday, 3 August 2020

Government Aged Care Covid Response – Growing Call for Analysis and Strategy


As Victoria’s Covid-19 crisis continues, it is in Australia’s interest that we reflect how we might deal better in preventing a spread and enhancing preparedness in dealing with any potential outbreak in the rest of the nation.

Previously lack of coordinated aged care response to Covid-19 had been cited by many commentators. The Government has now set up an Aged Care Response Centre drawing together Federal and State Government agencies, some professional associations and Peak bodies see here

This is intended to foster better and rapid response, including linkage with the hospital system and multidisciplinary teams. According to Federal and Victoria Governments announcements, the new coordinated system will better support communication with families including situations where a family work toward removing their elderly from aged care facility.

Over the last week I picked up on some interesting comments by Professor Joseph Ibrahim, Monash University and Professor Mary-Louise McLaws, Epidemilogist. The United Workers Union Survey expressing views of 1000 aged care workers is also great value, including comments made Carolyn Smith, President of United Workers Union.
Clearly more scrutiny seems necessary for optimal Covid-19 response within aged care homes.

Staff shortage is a recurring theme. Similarly, everyone seems to agree that the nursing homes have long and strongly relied on untrained casual workforce. Perversely, these nursing homes run without adequate registered nurses whose skills are essential to foster quality clinical and personal care.

So for those of us in Australian States that so far have contained Covid-19 spread, questions still remain – what are the aged care contingency workforce plans for the country that leaders have put in place over the last months of planning preparation? What do those plans look like and will be good for the public families with members in care to know. Let’s face it, the Victorian Premier Andrew recently said he did not have confidence in the majority of those private aged care homes in his state – and he would not put his mum in there!

The everyday picture from the ground highlights basic stuff that unless it is addressed in a systemic way, the potential for certain things to go wrong is there. Let’s look at some views of the United Workers Union surveyed 1000 nation-wide:
  • Close to a third of aged care workers did not get Covid-19 safety training including appropriate PPE use.
  • Concern of clear planned training schedule as stated “We did not get personal training about Covid-19, it was online. Half of the people didn’t even know there was training.”
  • Lacks good planning for workforce training that take account of the casual structure of the workforce
  • Over two-thirds felt not equipped to handle coronavirus outbreak
  • They see ‘Danger of cross infection’ I care settings
  • The majority of workers felt swamped by extra workloads
  • A massive 90 per cent of workers revealed not enough time is allocated to fully take care of their basic duties in providing personal care to the elderly
  • “We wake them up, put them in a chair, all day with no visitors, no extra staff and put them back to bed 8 hours later, with staff hardly getting a chance to talk to them….it’s not really care, I feel like a robot.”
  • “Some residents are going all day without staff even entering their rooms as there isn’t enough of us.”  
This survey concludes that there is absence of national preparedness seen in lack of strategy and plans to ensure the workforce was prepared, trained and equipped with safety protection measures.

My mind puzzled as to who is now overseeing aged care workforce development policy and strategy? I noted from my search that since the Feds abolished the Health Workforce Australia in 2014, apparently ‘the essential functions were transferred to the Department of Health(link).

But is the Department involved? Or did aged care workforce development become a casualty of neoliberal cut backs and doing away with Government planning?

Given recent events exposing staff shortage and neglect from having adequate registered nurses in nursing homes, it will be good to know who is responsible for workforce development policy and strategy for aged care.

Some of the highlights from ABC interviews with Professors Joseph Ibrahim and Professor Mary-Louise McLaws are really worthwhile following up, they give you another layer of complexity that needs to be fleshed out. It will be great to know how Governments are responding to the sorts of difficulties that these experts raise. Here are some key points they shared on ABC:
  • We ‘knew clinical care audits showed ability to manage infections was sub-optimal’
  • Decision makers ignored or overlooked the need to seek ‘expertise of people that work in the sector not just peak bodies’
  • Strangely Governments tasked the regulator of aged care services to manage the pandemic – this is a role misfit, and this body “don’t have sufficient senior clinical staff to inform pandemic response” in aged care.
  • The aged care built environment is not always suitable in tackling Covid-19
  • The built environment is not designed to minimise spread of infections
  • You need appropriately designed built environment to manage airflows – unlike hospitals, ‘aged care facilities are not up to that level’.
  • There are ‘no filters to prevent particles to escapeSo when you open door they escape’ to adjacent rooms with negative residents. So it spreads.
  • Strategy need to recognise that as things stand, nursing homes are structured as ‘shared spaces - these are like homes
  • Also important that there are ‘no shared staff at all’ working across residents with Covid-19 and those that are negative
  • These ‘Lessons need to be learnt again….. Newmarch, Spain, Italy, France, UK, Canada, USA – we should have been far advanced in planning and incidence control’
  • ‘Too many people involved and no one giving direction’

Call for analysis and strategy – How will Government respond?
Concerns from sector staff that they are not allocated adequate time to provide basic personal care, let alone deal with Covid19 issues. The Feds as funders and regulators, how do they deal with this issue in the short term & long term? What is the policy and strategy they use to underpin the funding and regulation framework?
  • Government are best advised to obtain additional expertise as suggested by experts mentioned above.
  • Built environment and challenge of managing cross infections in such settings – what is the strategy in dealing with challenge? Is this pro-actively discussed with families before outbreak occurs
  • What are available options (and risks) if there are families needing to evacuate their loved one prior and during Covid-19 outbreak; and overall communication strategy with families.
  • Who is the central person giving directions for aged care as some healthcare experts have asked?
  • What strategic measures across the country are put in place by Feds and sector providers to ensure we address risks of having support workers moving across multiple sites that involves contact with more vulnerable people?
  • Enhance sector preparedness in other states
  • Covid-19 safety training strategy needs attention
  • Is the Government planning any long term workforce development strategy or are we going to let the market continue its own way?  Put another way, here you can clearly see the limitations of adopting Thatcherism or Reaganomics! There are consequences.
  • Lessons learnt need to be shared by the Government as suggested by experts – this is essential for future learning, improvement and interrogation of facts and assumptions 

Reference Links
ABC, Afternoon Briefing Program, ABC Interviews Profs Joseph Ibrahim & Mary-Louise McLaws. 28 July 2020 https://iview.abc.net.au/show/afternoon-briefing/series/0/video/NU2020H103S00
ABC Radio, AM Program, Aged Care COVID-19 Survey Reveal Big Gaps in Preparations and Resources, 27 July 2020
Pandemic Failures in Aged Care Revealed in Survey, Media Release, United Workers Union. 27 July 2020 https://www.unitedworkers.org.au/pandemic-failures-in-aged-care-revealed-in-survey/
Department of Health, Health Workforce Australia Transition to the Department of Health. 21 June 2016. https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/hwa-archived-publications

Wednesday, 29 July 2020

Brief Commentary on ABC Q&A Covid-19 and Survival for the Fittest


What a week, and still midweek in Australia – the news from State of Victoria has many disappointed. The Covid-19 infections and death count for nursing home residents is distressing. Big policy debates are getting in the open – not to be missed – talking about who lives and dies is no small matter.

The Q&A ABC Program titled a Fight of Our Lives caught my interest, and you will see why. The people who appear in these panels can impact policy and strategic directions for better or worse. That in itself is not new as we are a democracy. But when it is about life and death, we better pay attention.

One of the key Q&A ABC Economic Panellist from the University of New South Wales insists Australia should prioritise the economy and wellbeing by letting about “12,000 to 25,000 elderly and immune-compromised” people die. She adds that we should “let the virus do what it has done in Sweden” where it has proportionally killed significant people. Shocking!

Many in the panel seemed alarmed by this view. But who knows which forces in the country subscribe to this view and who will prevail? The more reason to get informed and participate in our pluralist democracy; I presume we are still a pluralist democratic society (laugh out loud). I fear if we let the virus do its own thing, how different are we from eugenics? Goodness, hope WA borders with Eastern States remain closed for much, much longer (LoL).

Q&A Fight of Our Lives Program Link:
Panellists: Bill Bowtell, Adjunct Professor, UNSW and Strategic Health Policy Adviser; Gigi Foster, Economist, UNSW; George Megalogenis, Author and journalist; Cassandra Goldie, CEO of Australian Council of Social Service; and Karen Soo, Executive Officer at the Haymarket Chamber of Commerce.

You may also wish to check out the commentary on the FB link for 27 July 2020 when the program went to air. ABC FB Link: https://www.facebook.com/abcqanda/



Tuesday, 21 July 2020

Our Recent Covid-19 Management Learnings

What an unbelievable few weeks even from a restriction-eased Perth West Australia environment, reverberations from Melbourne Eastern seaboard felt palpable. And we keep learning lessons. We knew of some, but recent happenings call for lesson reinforcement.
                   
Original image courtesy: Dreamstime
Perth Optus Stadium is a popular visitor site as Covid-19 movement restrictions eases

I won’t delve into aged care homes, there are positive signs there Governments are making policy progress since Newmarch. And a quick big plus to Government’s economic stabilisation measures relating to Jobkeeper and Jobseeker post September – sounds balanced. Okay, next.

I was listening to the ABC a couple of days ago they were talking to a former Australian Medical Association President and prominent GP Mukesh Haikerwal. He pointed out that not all GP outlets are getting a steady supply of PPE: https://youtu.be/IQKaiia6zXE.

I thought what? What does it all mean if some General Medical Practice centres are short of masks and the like? What are safety and access impacts for staff and service users? I assumed every State is now awash with PPE, so why are masks not sufficiently reaching practitioners?

And there are other gaps. This same interview has to be heard to be believed. Dr Haikerwal noted lack of consistency in quarantining and isolation guidance practices:
  • Some clinics apply precautionary measures in that after testing a suspected covid-19 case they ask a person not to go to work or interact freely – you wait to get your result first
  • Some clinics perform tests and let you go to work
  • Other clinics are even said to let people with positive results go to work
  • Then there are cases where some people with proven positive Covid-19 results are not promptly notified - it still takes a couple of days before being contacted
  • In his view, the system is swamped
Check this out. Source: https://youtu.be/IQKaiia6zXE
             
Courtesy: Bigstock
Illustrates use of PPE
     
It is puzzling.  The Australian PM has restated in the media he has an open account to respond to State of Victoria’s requests, so why has Victoria been reluctant to maximize the Commonwealth offer and ensure early intervention? Why not use Commonwealth resources to ensure rapid responses and testing notifications so that the Victoria system is not overly swamped??

At a different level GP clinics on their part operate under Commonwealth Medicare system and likely supported by other Federal Department of Health programs. So why is it so hard for the Feds to ensure enough masks are distributed by the Commonwealth in the first instance to all GP practices?

In a previous article I mentioned the need to pro-actively engage communities not just in implementation but significantly in designing and formulating solutions See here.

However, the Melbourne crisis is bringing out more gaps to light on importance of social inclusion and participation. Here is an example of a glaring gap to include and draw insights from medical GPs on the ground working with migrant communities – I am using quotes more or less verbatim:
  • Nearby school with predominantly Arab speaking folk, Arab-speaking doctors in the area ignored - not engaged
  • Arabic speaking doctors in area with incidences of Covid are overlooked and not included in the trail
  • These doctors know these patients but are not included….Much we can do
  • Arab speaking doctors ignored - nonsensical – completely excluded
ABC Interview with GP and former AMA President Mukesh Haikerwal: https://youtu.be/IQKaiia6zXE

On inclusion, of course we are not just talking about clinical care.

The Melbourne Towers initial chaos made it evident that those planning at higher level are drawing knowledge from clinical and law-and-order type knowledge. But there were many of us left wondering why Victoria State authorities had no appreciation that they also needed care coordination and management informed by diverse cultural and psychosocial knowledge. It was so clear they were dealing with an issue requiring an inter-disciplinary approach. That would not be news to leaders and Ministers in those areas, surely.

So it should not be too surprising that the rest of us were shocked that authorities planned and implemented Towers Lockdown without getting input from experienced migrant workers/ social workers. This remains a puzzle given that when we think about crisis management, you would think those with experience working with people across psychosocial and cultural systems will not be excluded.

While we are at it, it is also a reminder that the removal of bits of policy development monies that used to be part of settlement services funded to the community sector across Australia is having long-term ramifications - government policy and design can benefit if such funding is restored. We can learn how the Aboriginal Community Controlled Healthcare Services are at least able to feed policy and design inputs through their structures.

I will also not be honest if I didn’t mention our own individual responsibility. We all go out and about and are familiar with our own or around about behaviours that we need to be overcome.

Try wearing a mask and see the looks you getJ. Someone once and in a sincere way asked me “are you crook love, why are you wearing a mask?” And this was while I was pursuing work in public space where social distancing was limited. Apparently something in our dominant Anglo-Saxon culture rubs people the wrong way if you wear a mask according to some commentators (laugh out loud).

If it was up to me, everyone taking a train, bus, taxi or rideshare should wear a mask. I also like the idea of masking up at shopping centres at least at peak hours. I am all for freedoms, but I think even if not compulsory masks should be encouraged as appropriately in Covid-19 risky spaces.

It is also common to see customers and staff at chemist shops without masks.  In my lay person’s mind I have thought wow, what if someone waiting there for their prescription has Covid-19, what then if none of us has a mask? Once I engaged in a friendly conversation with one of my local Pharmacist at the peak of the pandemic in WA. I asked how he managed without a mask. He said even as a Pharmacist at the time he could not get a mask though he wanted one. Luckily things have changed in my State; masks are available in abundance in many outlets.

Perhaps instead of waiting for a vaccine as a panacea of everything, how about we implement more of practical everyday small steps like masking up in public spaces like public transport and busy shopping centres? And it is good for the economy. We can learn from the social and economic disruption experienced in Melbourne.

On closing borders, yesterday I heard the NT First Minister say he will have borders closed for a couple of years presumably based on the recent Melbourne Covid-19 spread. Got to confess I had a bit of a chuckle. I don’t understand the powerful forces that wish to force States like WA to open borders prematurely. Just because the constitution says “trade between the Commonwealth to be free” surely should not drive us to abandon common sense. And herd immunity doesn’t work, spare us.

Instead of the likes of Clive Palmer taking the WA State to the Australian High Court, how about focussing on helping Victoria and NSW in preventing Covid-19 outbreaks more proactively?

If we neglect to address policy, design and implementation gaps that have emerged in Melbourne, then as country and if the rest of Australia is forced to open borders to Victoria and NSW, we are then headed for the least common denominator. Great as Australia has performed in tackling Covid-19, we will be blind not to admit there is room for improvement in preventing spread.

Tuesday, 30 June 2020

Victoria Covid19 Outbreak and Policy Response to Migrant Diversity


Despite Australia’s great success in containing Covid-19, the recent community outbreak in Victoria Melbourne suburbs with higher levels of migrants raises concern about some gaps in pro-active engagement and planning tailored to deliver culturally appropriate public healthcare responses.

On Monday and Tuesday 75 and 64 new cases respectively are reported. Affected areas are detailed on the Government link: Government Link
The Victoria Premier also just announced this afternoon 10 Melbourne postcodes involving many suburbs are going on lockdown as per Premier Press Conference.

Most Australian States have reported “0” outbreaks over the last few weeks, in a few cases only single digits. So while we are all wishing Victoria the very best outcome, we are wondering what is going on there? And are other states at potential risk?

The Victoria Government confirmed today that genomic sequencing has just shown the recent source of spread specifically came from hotel quarantine sites where travellers are kept. The infection controls at these sites failed resulting in hotel staff picking up Covid-19 from returning travellers and then spreading to families (Press Conference: Victoria Premier)

This verifies media reports over the last two weeks that people may have been moving around, some unaware they were infectious.

It also raises question that while Governments were rightly early on focussing on reorganising how hospital and GP medical sites interacted with the public, how much thought went into non-medical sites such as hotels for quarantined people? Particularly, who was thinking about hotel staff such as security guards and others?

For instance, Governments rightly saw it fit to put in place Telehealth Medicare payments for our medical GPs to safeguard their practices and patients from infections. Also some states offered their healthcare workers on clinical frontline tackling Covid-19 free accommodation options away from their home to minimise passing infections to family members.

Now let’s turn to security guards and other precariously employed staff at hotel sites accommodating quarantined travellers. What risk identification strategies were undertaken early on? And significantly what mitigation measures were put in place to minimise acquiring and passing on infections to families and community?

Hotel Security Guard: image Courtesy Shutterstock

                        


How much were issues of frontline hotel staff taken into account at planning level?

It is not uncommon to hear that people working in these sites hotels and hospitality in general their working conditions tend to be low. And we can only imagine the precariousness when some such as security guards are sent by contracting agencies.

Could it be that we have been somewhat overlooking need for thorough mitigation measures for lowly and precariously employed workers who sometimes tend to include large numbers of migrants?

This is not to take away the amazing measures that the Fed Government has put in place such as the doubling of Jobseekers payments or the Job Keeper payments. These remain historical and benefit people across population groups.

For those with “policy” hats, it helps if we reflect deeper on theoretical debates about public goods, private goods and mixed goods, and the justifications why we may decide a certain issue require attention.

In this case, we should not neglect that a hotel security guard and his family need as much protection. Otherwise Covid-19 could be spread far and wide from hotel parameters to community sites. The working conditions of a security guard are essential. We have seen this issue before with aged care workers in Nursing Homes, Baggage Airport Handlers and such.

I also think guaranteeing paid sick leave to precariously employed workers if they have confirmed Covid-19 cases unfortunately does not go far enough. How about the impacts when they go about to work with flu-like symptoms or when they are waiting for test outcomes? If aged care cases are to go by this is how some have passed on Covid-19 to others.

Again to those doing policy, surely there are “positive externalities” that come about and benefit the whole community if you ensure hotel staff and their security guards, food delivery people, casual aged care people are reasonably renumerated. Otherwise we all as a community pay some price such as the reimposition of Melbourne lockdowns, impact on business, impact on population mental wellbeing and so forth.

Although Governments are clearly doubling effort to stem the tide in Victoria, there are also reports that Governments could have done more to consult and collaborate with communities so that Governments could benefit from bottom-up knowledge perspectives.

The national Peak migrant body FECCA reported that the Government engagement with migrant communities across Australia was inadequate.

The Government’s own Expert Panel, the National COVID-19 Health and Research Advisory Committee noted that the community feedback indicated that Government engagement occurred "on an ad-hoc basis or not at all" (SBS). The Panel:
Warned the Federal Government of a "missed opportunity" to prevent coronavirus outbreaks in high-risk groups like migrant communities, several weeks before a spike of cases in Victoria [Reference…….]

Further, according to the ABC the Expert Report released on 21 May 2020
  • Pinpointed that migrants and refugees were one of the groups at-risk of acquiring Covid-19 and unknowingly spreading it as well.
  • Said migrants are more likely to have a chronic disease and miss out on important health information
  • FECCA identified state and federal governments’ collective failure to engage with community leaders
  • Band-Aid afterthought solutions are used instead of carefully designed policy and program responses to migrant communities
  • Lack of willingness to intentionally draw important input from vulnerable members of the community early on to ensure solutions are inclusive and designed appropriately
(ABC News: Government Warned Failing to Engage Migrant Communities)

Also, according to the The Conversation online newspaper, ‘’spatial concentration” seems to be a factor in most of the Melbourne suburbs associated with the rise in new Covid-19 cases. “People in overcrowded or unaffordable or insecure housing may have less control over their immediate environment and less capacity to isolate themselves” (The Conversation 29 June 2020).

People on low incomes could be under pressure to attend work despite feeling unwell to meet their everyday expenses. The high cost of living does not simply go away just because you manage to negotiate rent reduction with a Landlord (The Conversation 29 June 2020). For more info see The Conversation Link on: Overcrowding and Housing Affordability Stress-Melbourne.

The Melbourne lockdown starts in a few hours. The extensive community testing blitz continues with public health staff knocking at homes in suburbia with reports some people are refusing to be tested. And we now know the Premier for Victoria is putting in a place a Judicial Inquiry to look at look at how infection control breaches took place involving hotel quarantine staff (See SBS Link for Victoria Premier Press Conference.

I am tempted to make some suggestions. But even as I do, and as restrictions are eased in my state in the west of Australia, I am left with a lingering feeling that “There go many of us but by Grace God”. Our hearts across the country are with Victoria.

Suggestions

  • Forced test if are to occur should be of non-invasive type such as Saliva test. This may foster trust than forced internal swabs, ethically better to spit sample in a container especially if person is forced.
  • Judicial inquiry being commissioned by Victoria Premier should look at how vulnerable frontline roles as security guards, hotel workers or whatever are protected from contracting Covid-19 and passing to their families. But this should not be an exercise in transferring risk to these precariously employed people
  • Just as the nation gives incentives for medical GPs to receive Telehealth payments, consider how you incentivise these lowly paid workers such as contracted security guards and hotel staff at quarantine sites.
  • Casual workers with flu-like symptoms should be considered for paid leave and not wait until they tested and proved as Covid-19 positive. If Australia focuses on simply compensating those with proven Covid-19, we run the danger of having some people with flu-like symptoms turn up at work and spread the virus.
  • Migrant community engagement should not be simply reduced to language translation – there is more to it than that. Mere language translation strategy runs the danger of simplifying things to a ‘white’ mainstream Western lens.
  • A public health approach must pro-actively include culturally targeted strategies from the beginning, not in a reactive way as an afterthought.

References

Premier Victoria. Press Conference, 30 June 2020, SBS link https://youtu.be/W7IZ5If7nNI

The Conversation. Overcrowding and affordability stress: Melbourne’s COVID-19 hotspots are also housing crisis hotspots 29 June 2020, https://theconversation.com/overcrowding-and-affordability-stress-melbournes-covid-19-hotspots-are-also-housing-crisis-hotspots-141381
ABC, Author: Stephanie Dalzell. Government warned of coronavirus 'missed opportunity' to protect migrant communities before Victorian spike. 24 June 2020. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-06-24/government-warned-failing-engage-migrant-communities-coronavirus/12384800
SBS, Government rubbishes reports migrant communities weren't included in coronavirus response. https://www.sbs.com.au/news/government-rubbishes-reports-migrant-communities-weren-t-included-in-coronavirus-response
FECCA [Federation of Ethnic Communities Councils] CALD Resources for COVID-19: http://fecca.org.au/coronavirus/
Victoria Translated Corona Virus Resources for People from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Backgrounds. https://www.dhhs.vic.gov.au/translated-resources-coronavirus-disease-covid-19?fbclid=IwAR1Pk8iNCH6gxMT4VWGKDcGMUCDTY0l1PADeerWynPH9yQ7ZQ_4toihHj7w
Premier for Victoria. Statement from the Premier. 20 June 2020. https://www.premier.vic.gov.au/statement-from-the-premier-45/
Premier for Victoria, Statement from the Premier. 25 June 2020. https://www.premier.vic.gov.au/statement-from-the-premier-46/
The Conversation, Overcrowding and affordability stress: Melbourne’s COVID-19 hotspots are also housing crisis hotspots, 29 June 2020, https://theconversation.com/overcrowding-and-affordability-stress-melbournes-covid-19-hotspots-are-also-housing-crisis-hotspots-141381

Sunday, 28 June 2020

Nursing Home Tragedy – Institutional and Policy Failure, a Commentary


The Australian Fed and State Governments have done amazing work to contain Covid-19 spread. But the significant loss of life at Sydney Anglicare Newmarch Nursing Home deserve closer look. Why? Without a review mistakes made maybe repeated in the future.

According to the ABC Four Corners Program, lack of appropriate prompt intervention at Newmarch after initial Covid-19 detection, by “18th day [led to] 56 infections, 22 staff and 34 residents, 12 people dead’’, and final total life loss of 19.

So what fell short? Remember families on Tele protesting outside the Nursing Home for days asking info about their elderly folk inside the aged care facility? The Four Corners episode now reveals a more worrying account from interviews with families as per link: https://youtu.be/1b3YJagAkLs

In a nutshell, I am paraphrasing some key points applying policy lenses:
  • There appear to be clear inadequacies in care, clinical management and policy framework to safeguard the wellbeing of residents
  • Elderly people were denied the option of being treated in a hospital setting equipped with higher level clinical care
  • Families not allowed input into clinical management such as having the choice to have their elderly treated in hospital
  • Government orders/regulations were in place to prevent families from removing elderly relatives from the Nursing Home even if the elderly person did not have Covid-19. Families told breach of orders could result in substantial $ fines  
  • The longer elderly people were left in the Newmarch facility, the more of them contracted Covid-19.
  • Reports by some elderly people that they were not given adequate nutrition - expected to make do with peanut butter sandwiches or frozen sandwich lunches
  • Families denied basic communication with elderly residents
  • Poor infection controls
  • One reported lack of readily available supplies to support dehydrated residents
Surprisingly the Government Regulator that is the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commissioner told the ABC thatsays there is nothing that fell short on Newmarch”.


Although Nursing Homes are operated by private and NGO agencies, these facilities are partly funded the Federal Government and individual residents. They are also regulated by Government. Residents in Nursing Homes on paper have similar rights to everyone in the community, even more so in their case as vulnerable groups they have a right to be protected.

At the peak of the Covid-19 crisis, it was clear the Government daily briefs had hospitals and GP medical sites well covered in it its planning at a granular level. There seems to be gaps when it comes to Nursing Homes (even though after the tragedy the Government provided extra funding to these facilities).

To date, it is not clear why the Fed Government in its fore planning did not prioritise giving daily or regular updates on how Nursing Homes were faring – in terms of detection, containment, clinical management reviews, and general care. This is was essential for rapid monitoring.

Why was it that rapid improvements were not being implemented to contain daily spread and offer better clinical care as soon as it was obvious Newmarch had no capacity to offer very basic care? Why is this different to overseas evacuees? Why is the treatment different to many other mainstream clusters?

Why it is that available public info indicates that basic personal care, clinical care and even nutrition were awfully neglected? Quite honestly, is peanut sandwich the sort of meals that would adequately support someone to fight Covid-19 infection? 

We could go on with lack of personal care – how could Government not concern itself where an elderly person has no access to a bath for more than two weeks?


The issues raised by this tragedy go well beyond Newmarch – the Government need to look at its own policy, care and clinical frameworks guiding Nursing Home operations and the interface with hospitals. One could go on staffing issues, perhaps a subject for another day.

Links
ABC Four Corners. Like the Plague: How Coronavirus spread among our most vulnerable elderly residents. Jun 22, 2020. https://youtu.be/1b3YJagAkLs


'No one knows where it came from': Inside Australia's first COVID-19 cluster.

The Sydney Morning Herald, Harriet Alexander, 10 May 2020

Sixth resident of Sydney nursing home dies of coronavirus as national tally rises to 41. April 2020

Thursday, 18 June 2020

Recent Australia’s ABC Podcast on Positives and Alarming Aspects of Artificial intelligence Possibilities


Not to be missed, here is a link:
AI enables machines to 'think' at a speed and depth far beyond human capacity, unleashing incredible possibilities but also the potential for harm. Will we see a new cold war as China and the US battle for tech supremacy?” [ABC]