Wednesday, 15 April 2020

UK Nursing Home Covid-19 Deaths Go Unreported in Daily Official Data Updates!



There is startling news that the official UK Covid-19 death updates do not include figures of elderly people dying in nursing homes.

How is this possible? According to news reports the NHS daily mortality updates only accounts for hospital deaths! Nursing home deaths are only incorporated in the Office of National Statistics weekly stats.

Given the exponential Covid-19 infection growth rates; how does such official reporting lag impact community and policy debates? What are implications for clinical, prevention and policy responses for nursing home clusters? What does this say about the treatment of the elderly?

Click sources below fresh from the press. They include Associated Press, The Guardian & the ABC. Worth a read, what a strange time!

Sources:
Niam McIntyre & Pamela Duncan, 15 April 2020. Care homes and coronavirus: why we don't know the true UK death toll

Robert Booth & Rowena Mason, 15 April 2020. UK coronavirus: care providers allege Covid-19 death toll underestimated. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/14/uk-care-providers-allege-covid-19-death-toll-underestimated

Jill Lawless & Sylvia Hui, Associated Press printed by the ABC. 15 April 2020. Figures show hundreds of COVID-19 deaths in UK care homes. https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/figures-show-hundreds-covid-19-deaths-uk-care-70135462

Sunday, 5 April 2020

Policy Transformation in a Day – Heard Such a Thing!



Historic policy transformations – response to Covid-19 crisis

The Covid-19 pandemic is forcing some key Western societies to freeze significant economic activities as a way to impede the advance of this disease. Concurrently countries such as Australia have embarked on unimaginable and rapid policy transformations shaking foundations of modern neo-liberal economies.

“Whoever heard of such a thing? Can a land be made to bring forth in one day?” This saying reverberated in my mind as I was glued to my TV in astonishment listening to the nature and pace of policy changes at work. So I Googled to confirm which ancient Biblical author said this. It came from the writings of Prophet Isaiah.

In Australia, the announced Government response to Covid-19 so far includes measures costing close to $300 billion:
  • A doubling of income support (social security benefits) for unemployed people, and an additional one-off top up payment
  • A $130 billion JobKeeper Payment to businesses including sole traders as wage subsidy, subject to set criteria
  • Working families to receive free childcare the next 6 months to meet family needs and ensure survival of the childcare sector
  • Access to a portion of superannuation (retirement funds) for those in need subject meeting certain conditions
  • Measures by Government and Reserve Bank to support the flow and cost of credit


In the midst of a dark cloud and grief from impacts visited on the globe by Covid-19, we see rapid formation of humane policies affirming the worth and dignity of all Australians is an absolute miracle to behold. Who wouldn’t want to chronicle this moment even though utter sorrow is around!

It took a Great Depression and World War II to lay conditions for the emergence of what became the welfare state – growth in access to institutional social security benefits, education, housing programs and the like.

The rise of neo-liberalism was equally a very monumental change, but occurred gradually and succeeded in dismantling the welfare state as we knew it, transforming it into a very selective and targeted safety net.

Even the applauded Prices and Incomes Accord of Hawke-Keating era that produced universal superannuation, enhanced family payments and childcare and facets of social wage took time to be negotiated, thought-through and put into place. After all Australia was globalising and going neo-liberal to avoid becoming a ‘banana republic’ (LoL). Needless to say the country needed to tackle stagflation, modernise the economy and minimise industrial disputes.

It is still confounding that the emergence of Covid-19 has had such cascading impacts from loss of life, disruption of economic and social life, etc. To contain its advancement, global movement is shattered – borders closed, planes grounded and tourism stopped. Global supply chains impaired, putting under great test our globalised economic system. Global sports and education operations are disrupted; hospitality industry and the arts are shattered. Financial markets go south. And the list goes on. And these impacts from one virus and reportedly one wet market! Who could have imagined of such cascading effects?

And then back to the now - when overnight some fundamentals of neo-liberalism are cast aside, it is an amazing thing to see. Who is not astonished by the doubling of income support for the unemployed given the political contestation over this issue? Who is not astounded that parents can now access free childcare for the next six months?   
Even the IMF is now largely of similar mind, encouraging state interventionist policies, emphasizing:
The success of the pace of recovery will depend crucially on policies undertaken during the crisis. If policies ensure that workers do not lose their jobs, renters and homeowners are not evicted, companies avoid bankruptcy, and business and trade networks are preserved, the recovery will occur sooner and more smoothly.
Who knows what Australia economic arrangements would look like after Covid-19 is contained or consigned to past history!

It is hard though to imagine the benefits for unemployment people will go back to being so much below the poverty line as may have been the case over the last decade or two.

Similarly it will be interesting to see what tomorrow’s globalised world looks like.

And who knows what economic miracles or challenges await?

But let me do this article justice with an important policy concern regarding the 60+ old plus, and also a different issue about cruise ships.

Protect 60+ Year Olds – Work Settings Covid-19 Exposure
A lot has been said about protecting the 60 year-old plus and ensuring grandkids don’t pass Covid-19 to grandparents. But policy implementation needs to clearly protect 60+olds from work related Covid-19 exposure. For example, contractors in a gig economy such as rideshare and taxis have limited options to social-distance. It is clear people in the community and local travellers can potentially spread Covid-19 in the transport system thus putting 60+ year olds at risk.

This can be managed by simply allowing 60+ year olds in the gig rideshare economy (perhaps even taxi drivers of same age) to take their businesses into hibernation. It is a targeted way of preventing such at-risk groups turning to clusters with serious Covid-19 clinical presentations.

Ship Cruises, Hospital Care & Taxes
Another thing came to mind about taxation and mutuality after the agony the country has been going through connected to Covid-19 Cruise ships crisis. Mainstream media reported that some of these ships are registered in tax havens like the Caribbean and places like that.

Post Covid-19, surely the Federal and State Governments need to look at cruise ship owners contribute direct taxes. The fact is cruise crew and passengers are benefiting from public hospitals and private hospitals that are now treating Covid-19 patients.

Australian citizens and residents during this crisis are coming to terms that their elective and urgent elective surgery in public and private system will be delayed in order to attend serious Covid-19 needs. This is all very well as serious Covid-19 health concerns needs to be prioritised – it is a humane thing to do.

But surely, going forward these cruise companies must be brought into line in terms of taxation obligations. There are strong ethical and moral issues here. Australian citizens, residents and Australian companies contribute taxes and insurance hospital cover. It is an ethical and moral thing to realise that if you are going to use services of a country, you should be paying taxes. In the future it is problematic if these cruise ships that choose to avoid tax by registering in tax haven, yet expect Government support at taxpayer’s expense.



Monday, 20 January 2020

Australia Digital Privacy – Update and Commentary



The rising privacy concerns amidst the growing digital economy are getting clearer for many to see. The idea though that individuals can simply opt out of digital realm to protect privacy neglects the fact that commerce, economic, social and political participation are increasingly conducted on digital platforms. If this is the case, where does Australia go from here in strengthening digital privacy?

Info Analytics, Courtesy: Pixabay illustrations
In my view, it’s not enough to just target Facebook, Twitter and Google. A national digital privacy regime needs to cast a wider net of digital platforms that need to be accountable in how they enhance individual privacy and appropriate use of personal data.

I will give some examples. Last year I was surprised by a reputable state-wide company alerting that their recruitment data may have been compromised through a third party digital contractor. What? I didn’t even know they used external third party for their things digital.

And also another well-known global digital recruiter alerted individuals of similar kinds of data breaches on its platform.

The bit I was able to learn is that so far at most all these organisations need to do is inform individuals whose data they hold, that some breach has occurred. But this is not enough protection really.

Okay, I still have to say in this case I took certain minor steps at an individual level to safeguard some aspects of my info from being misused.

But critically wondered how does Australia as a nation ensure data collected by recruiters and stored on online systems is only used by them for purposes of recruitment and contract purposes?

Privacy governance net should include recruiters on top of the likes of Facebook. But let’s linger on casting a wider net to enhance privacy. Besides, serious policy work requires paying attention in understanding and defining the parameters of the issues you are dealing with.

Take our widespread participation into Customer Loyalty Programs (Reward Programs) be it in supermarkets, petrol stations, liquor stores, you name it. Who wants to be left out from saving costs? Perhaps you go for Flybuys, or Rewards, or Velocity or whatever. As a population we feel relieved when we save a few dollars here and there through these loyalty programs.
If you are a ‘privileged’ frequent airline traveller, most likely you look forward to accumulating enough loyalty points to secure a free ticket or upgrade from Economy to a higher travel Class. Who doesn’t want that?

Recently I was shopping some supplies at a particular outlet. I learnt that I had earned myself some few dollars in cash to be used for discount or later use. So you can earn $5 or $10 or whatever? A more important point is that commerce is now so much interlinked. There are growing cross linkages in loyalty programs. Supermarkets can be linked with fuel stations, airlines, hotel and airbnb accommodation, dining, and liquor supplies.

Not to mention Rideshare Platforms, though presumably some rideshares are subject to some aspects of the European Union privacy framework.

Of course any digital privacy governance should also ensure Australians as individuals are not disadvantaged by use of any data collected by Government agencies state, federal, Local Governments and all their Third Party contractors.

Now, given the spread of data collected across the domain of the digital economy, social and political realm, it is overdue for Australia to develop and implement a national policy and regulatory frameworks to safeguards privacy and use of our data.

The long and short of this is that we now know our data is regarded as ‘valuable as gold’, so how can we guarantee companies  are only using the data for loyalty purposes and that such data is not misused?

We also know it’s not enough to tell people that they can improve privacy by opting out of the digital world. If so, such choice excludes them from social and political communication, commerce and economic participation in the modern digital arena.

The Australian Consumer and Competition Commission (ACCC) looks like it has done some very interesting background work lately drawing attention to emerging concerns about digital privacy.

An ACC Report specifically Chapter 7 calls the Government to address privacy policy concerns at a higher institutionalised and broader social economic level. You can glimpse it on this link. 

Here are also verbatim recommendations that the ACCC makes to the Feds about the need to reform the Australian digital privacy more broadly:
Recommendations in Chapter 7
Recommendation 16: Strengthen protections in the Privacy Act
Recommendation 17: Broader reform of Australian privacy law
Recommendation 18: OAIC privacy code for digital platforms
Recommendation 19: Statutory tort for serious invasions of privacy
Recommendation 20: Prohibition against unfair contract terms
Recommendation 21: Prohibition against certain unfair trading practices
Mind you, to the Federal Government credit, the work of this ACCC Inquiry was reportedly initiated by the Feds (as indicated on the ACCC web). But as already noted the benefits of this background work it seems to me can only be realised if Australia as a federal system follows up with sound institutionalised and broader level reforms.

This will mean reworking big time from our current patchwork of privacy policy. From what I can glean, this is how things interactively work at state and Federal level:

It is still puzzling why relevant Government agencies at both Federal and state levels are not playing a lead role in digital privacy policy development? Is neo-liberalism so entrenched that the significance of proactive policy development is not being pursued? Perhaps that is even the more remarkable that the ACCC has spoken up more forthrightly. 

And luckily, we won’t be starting from scratch. Australia should look at the recent progressive digital privacy policy reforms implemented by the European Union. This is essential if at all Australia is to get serious about protecting our privacy and personal data from misuse.

For readers interested in the way the European Union now enshrines and safeguards individual digital privacy rights through legislation and regulatory frameworks see these links:
If our data comes to be regarded as simply liquid gold by the more powerful without overarching national digital privacy governance, more could be lost than meets the eye.

Monday, 30 December 2019

Australia’s Morrison Government Religious Freedom Bills under Consultation



Latest Update on Religious Freedom Bills:

The Morrison Australia's Federal Government has released its updated version of Religious Freedom Bills for public consultation.

Note that the consultation period for these legislative Exposure Drafts run between “10 December 2019 and 31 January 2020.”

Here is the Government link to these Bills and the processes involved. Worth a look:

Folau-Rugby Australia: Reverberations on Role of the State


The risk for such a worker is increased when some employers and professional groups introduce revised standards, codes and everyday organisational policies that seek to conflict with the way previously religious freedoms had embedded professional ethical practices. It is no secret that in the past a Judeo-Christian ethic permeated certain ways that many Western countries framed laws, policies, professional codes and practices. 

In other words, this case has implications for what in public policy is called the role of the state. When Government (Federal & State) legislate laws, and when it puts in place regulations to guide how individuals navigate society and institutions – it’s all part of what we call role of the state. Even when Governments choose to do nothing, this too is a policy choice with ramifications.

Personally, I support religious freedoms, much as I also believe Christianity in everyday simultaneously calls us not to judge or cast the first stone.

But I don’t believe to be a good citizen in a country or the world you should be forced to reject the New Testament (Gospel). I don’t believe to be a good worker you should be forced to recant everyday Christian teachings that are compiled in the Gospel if that is what you follow.

The thing is, if more organisations feel free to implement employment codes that prevent believers from exercising Christian practices, then in time more Christians in Australia who seek to follow the teachings of the New Testament may get into trouble in situations where religious expression come into conflict with new professional codes. Let’s face it, any other Rugby player who may be doing a normal weekly church reading or lay preaching may find themselves in trouble should someone take offence if they quote some part of the bible about one thing or the other.

I am not questioning the importance being professional and the valuing of all human dignity, but if redefining professionalism and the human dignity to mean compelling people to recant some of basics of the Gospel then that is not a strong foundation for an inclusive society.


If Government does nothing, as an individual employee you are left on your own against new emerging codes, organisational policies and standards of your organisation as these new professional forms are seek to disentangle themselves from the Judeo-Christian ethic.

Basically when commentators condemn Government efforts to legislate legal protections for people not to be kicked out of their jobs for subscribing to religion, what such commentators seem to be implying is that they want individuals to fend for themselves against employer organisations.

Unless Australia enacts a legislation protecting religious freedom, we will see certain entrenched change in some areas of workforce participation.  Much as people of faith are not immune from imperfections, you will have to be a brave person indeed to think that Australian society is better off by excluding some Christians from work spaces because someone quoted a biblical verse.

The words of one public commentator come to mind (paraphrased), if you think as a society our system has issues because of believers, wait and see how the system works out if these groups face institutionalised exclusion.  I suppose that goes for all of us, sometimes your true neighbour may not turn up in a form you expect. 

And just one more thing, employment participation is just one area. As increased areas of professional, moral and ethical practices are being revised such as the recent assisted dying laws and much more, I suspect we haven’t seen the last of religious freedom debates. At the centre of it seems to be effort to extricate from the Judeo-Christian ethic as a dominant form that underpinned the relationship between individual, society and the State.



Saturday, 5 October 2019

Heard about the Right to Repair Goods?


Have you heard about the Right to Repair? Are you keen on responsible use of resources instead of our throwing out your cell phone, electronic gadgets, machinery and such? Are you interested in consumer and small business issues? There is a growing voice of people calling for the Right to Repair – I learnt this some months ago while flicking through radio channels.

Let me start at the beginning. Sometime back I went to repair my smartphone and Telco folks and repairers told me to get a new one. Can’t you just fix it I asked? One Telco retailer tried to sell me a new service contract instead. It seemed too wasteful to throw away after only two years since purchase. And money doesn’t grow on trees (LOL). Eventually I found a repairer who charged almost $300 for screen replacement and data recovery. Ouch, costly! But better than dumping my phone.

So I was really pleased one day when I heard this excellent Radio interview about the Right to Repair.

I turned to Google and realised many people hold similar concerns about diminishing consumer repair options for phones, vehicles, farm machinery like tractors and more.

I also learnt that some small businesses such as auto mechanic centres, some farmers and others are gradually restricted by manufacturers about repair work.

How does this come about? Basically more and more cars, phones, farm machinery are increasingly designed in such a way that they can’t be easily repaired at your local repairer as we did in the olden days. With vehicles we now rely more on service dealers authorised by a manufacturer. The reasons sound complex but may include how manufacturers choose to design products.

Obviously new innovative designs can be a reflection of product improvement and efficiency. But looking at articles on Google, it seems as possible that design strategy can be used as a way to maintain monopoly as to where and if goods can be serviced. Software used in these products is also implicated.

So it turns out there are situations you purchase a gadget or machinery, but you remain locked into the wishes of the manufacturer about your repair options.

Perhaps you have also heard about some big manufacturers using software update releases to degrade phone battery without your knowledge, presumably as a way to get some unsuspecting folk get a new phone or contract costing one or two grand or something (LOL).

This is not to dismiss the importance of innovation and technological development beneficial for society and the broader economy.

But I confess I was surprised to hear even some farmers face restrictions on repairs they can make on their own farm machinery purchased with their own hard cash. Before it is said they had more options to repair their own machinery.

And if opportunity for repair continues to reduce, this impact on small businesses like mechanic services, electronic phone repairers and the like.

But an economy is also how well we use our resources (resource allocation). If a global manufacturer sells goods and designs those goods in a way that monopolise the repair market, that runs the danger of stifling competition. It also means less sustainable small business auto businesses, unless we have market competition, etc.

Should manufacturers be designing items in a way that ensures they cannot be repaired? Is Australia able to impose some kind of standards on design of such imports and local produced goods? Is it sensible that we should be dumping our smart phones every two years so a Telco can sell us a new contract? Given the high value of material used to make these gadgets why not encourage designs that are less wasteful and keep small business like repairers in the market?

This is also the stuff of future economic equality or equity. Policy makers would want to see that small business are a having a fair go through fair competition.

If they put their mind to it, surely policy makers should be able to do a bit of sorting out about which design practices a fair and good innovation. And which product design strategies are merely used to gradually do away with competition.



What can Government Do?


I reckon among other things the Federal Government can undertake what they call Competition Neutrality reviews in relation to designs and servicing of smartphones, vehicles, farm machinery. This is one way of encouraging manufacturers and their dealers to play fair.

Basically the practices of manufacturers and their dealers need to be brought under the banner of Australia National Competition Policy for a particular period.

In such a situation a Competition Neutrality review will help with some baseline understanding of which aspects of manufacturing design are truly about innovation and good technological development, and which bits are just strategies to stifle competition.  

While we can never go back to the olden ways, we can still manage the current situation more fairly.

Don’t miss out the info below.



Links

My blog article above only gives you a glimpse. You will find some interesting media coverage on the Right to Repair on the links I have provided below. They are worth your time and they highlight some really practical stuff.

A link to ABC story about what Australia’s Consumer Affairs Ministers are considering to boost laws that may help consumers have more opportunity to repair their electronic gadgets

A link to ABC story highlighting a call by small business and environmentalist for Government to introduce regulation on Right to Repair


6PR 882 Story on Right to Repair

A Guardian story about manufacturers who got fined in Europe for slowing smartphones using software releases!
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/oct/24/apple-samsung-fined-for-slowing-down-phones



Monday, 2 September 2019

Red Rover, Science and Christianity



We have heard some amazing scientists’ space exploration stories this year. Among other things, I had caught glimpses about the Red Rover and Mars tales on TV before. But it is always even more delightful to learn of scientists who love and seek God.
So imagine my surprise recently as I discovered a worshipper in our row at a Perth church Sunday Service was none other Dr Roger Wiens, the ChemCam & SuperCam Principal Investigator. He is also known as the author of Red Rover: Inside the Story of Robotic Space Exploration, from Genesis to the Mars Rover Curiosity. To God’s glory!
Dr Wiens was in attendance at a Hillsong Perth Service enroute to the Pilbara region as we learnt from him that particular Pilbara fossils have something to tell or teach us about Mars.
For those keen on things space-exploration, the book mentioned is published by Amazon, here are some links:
And
There are interesting reviews on Dr Wiens Red Rover publication the Washington Post, and also a Kirkus Review.
Washington Post:
Kirkus Reviews:
And to finish on things Christianity and science, there is another interesting web link to Dr Roger Wiens interviewed about how science sits with religion.  Happy reading folk.
Dr Roger Wiens On Faith Science, and Mars – Biologos web link:


Wednesday, 7 August 2019

African Resource List - Perth


This page is under progress, it contains African Resources List in Perth, Western Australia.
It is aimed to inform any Africans in WA who may be isolated and are looking for what’s out there relevant for everyday living. It includes resource info can be social, cultural, economic, recreational, services, support group and so forth. Care is taken at the time of publication to ensure the info is current. However be aware that contacts and nature of support provided by organisations can change over time.

Community Groups

Ethiopian Church in Kenwick
Debre Amin Abune Teklehaimanot Church
358 Bickley Road
Kenwick WA 6107
Contact:
Abba Haileluel Tefera (Monk) – 0431 145 940
 Abba Sahlemariam Tessema (Monk) – 0410 832 672

Youth Group: Tegaru Youth Group
Mr Araya Abera – 0401 172 627

Women’s Group :    Tigray Women’s Association of WA       
Secretary: Mrs Desta Hadgu – 0402 655 528

Tanzanian Community of WA

Fashion, Beauty & Style

Amare Fashion

Connect With Us
Instagram: @AMAREFASHIONHOUSE
Facebook: : @AMAREFASHIONHOUSE
Mob: 0420437925

Beauty in Totality

Safuratu Bakare
Cosmetologist
Mob: 0415 848 900
Range of Services
·        Make-up, Bride and Bridal Train
·        Engagement/Traditional Marriage
·        Birthday/Special Occasions
·        Advertising/ Model make-up
·        Magazine coverage of events
·        Sales and rental of African costumes
·        Tailored to fit clothing and sales of African fabrics

Stylist

Molinda Danda
Phone: 08 9510 6914
Mob: 449 166 802



A Taste of African Food


My Place Bar & Restaurant

Caters for wide ranging Australian tastes and also captures African tastes. I have included their special section featuring “African Eats” further below. My Place Bar & Restaurant describes their service in broader terms here:
We are a restaurant and bar where you can unwind with your friends and loved ones after a hectic day at work. Our restaurant features stunning views which sweeps across the vast swathes of the Australian landscape. Our dishes are as aesthetically pleasing as the views. They are prepared with utmost dedication. Dining at our restaurant would be a captivating experience. It is because I have strived hard to showcase the great quality and diversity that modern Australian cuisine can offer.


General website: https://myplacebar.com.au//


“African Eats” Menu can be located here: https://www.myplacebar.com.au/our-menu/

Includes special section listing to name a few: spicy African soups, Ugali (sadza) to plantain (ndizi), pounded yam, tilapia and the like – worth clicking on the full menu


Address:                    70 Pier Street

Phone:                       9225 5963 / 0421 854 552

Email:                         info@myplacebar.com.au



Multicultural Services

Multicultural Services Centre
The Multicultural Services Centre supports migrant settlement, health and wellbeing, employment services, Emergency Relief, Multicultural Housing Services, Multicultural Disability Services, etc.
Locations: North Perth, Morley, Mirrabooka, Cannington & Bunbury
Head Office: Address: 20 View Street, North Perth, WA 6006
Phone: 9328 2699


Metropolitan Migrant Resource Centre
Offers settlement and case coordination supports, support groups, family support, youth, sports and recreational activities, employment supports and so forth.

Address: 9/24 Chesterfield Road, Mirrabooka WA
Phone: 08 9345 5755


Multicultural Futures
Multicultural Futures offers various migrant support services mainly south of the river.
Settlement services, health and wellbeing, accommodation and housing,

Address: 241-243 High Street, Fremantle
Phone: 08 9336 8282
Operational locations also include Cockburn, Kwinana and Langford. Further details as below:

CARAD
The Centre for Asylum Seekers, Refugees and Detainees (CARAD) Offers basic welfare & advocacy assistance to asylum seekers, refugees and detainees in WA.

Refugee Council Directory Link
This site offers multiple links to wide ranging agency and community supports across WA.


Mainstream Australian Resources

Ask Izzy

This mainstream website is worth a look. It provides extensive list of resources in wide ranging areas such as:
·        Food assistance
·        Housing support
·        Everyday things
·        Domestic violence
·        Health
·        Centrelink
·        Money help
·        Emotional and mental health support
·        Legal assistance
·        Money assistance (Emergency Relief)
·        Drugs and alcohol support services
·        Assistance to find work
·        Life skills and education

Sussex Street Community Law Centre
A useful legal service includes free legal education sessions & short night legal advice appointments if you are dealing with family or civil law issues

Community Legal & Advocacy Centres

Community Legal & Advocacy Centres across Western Australia can be located on the link below. You will also find specific info on each site about specific, general or specialised support they offer. It can be a handy resource when you need to navigate the Australian legal system, including consumer law issues.



Acknowledgements
Thanks to the following individuals for their input in the resource info:
Elaine West
Lesley Akora
Letty Durkin

Pius Joseph


Subscribe to Updates:
Contact: pendobtm@gmail.com